Comparison of FCS-MPC Predictive Control and Predictive Control Based on Lyapunov Theory in Seven-Level PUC Rectifier
Subject Areas : electrical and computer engineering
Alimohammad
Mohammadpour Behbid
1
(Faculty of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Iran)
Mohammad Reza
Alizadeh Pahlavani
2
(دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر)
Arash
Dehestani Kolagar
3
(Faculty of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Iran)
Alireza
Davari
4
(Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University)
Keywords: Lyapunov function, finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC), multi-level converter, seven-level PUC converter (PUC7),
Abstract :
In this paper, two predictive control methods for dual output multilevel rectifier are compared. The investigated structure is a seven-level PUC rectifier, which was selected based on high reliability and low cost. Increasing the number of input voltage levels helps to reduce the amount of harmonics and consequently reduce the size of power filters. On the other hand, current conduction in this converter is performed continuously and the problems of current discontinuity such as complexity in analysis and the requirement to use large induction filters on the DC side are solved. First, the design is accomplished based on the FCS-MPC method and two different output voltages with ratios of 1 and 3 are obtained. Also, the control of output DC voltages and unity input power factor is well provided. Then, to achieve better stability, the MPC method based on Lyapunov theory has been utilized. In this method, the target variables are defined in the Lyapunov function and the cost function is derived from the same Lyapunov function. The advantages of this approach compared to the conventional MPC method are no need for gain adjustment, easier implementation and fewer sensors (the load current is estimated using the PUC7 rectifier mathematical model). The simulation of both FCS-MPC and predictive control based on Lyapunov method is carried out using Matlab/Simulink and the results of both methods are presented and compared with each other. Finally, it can be seen that in the Lyapunov-based method, the tracking of the reference current is smoother and with less fluctuations, and the seven-level rectifier voltage also has a more regular and sinusoidal waveform.
[1] X. Zhang, G. Tan, T. Xia, Q. Wang, and X. Wu, "Optimized switching finite control set model predictive control of NPC single-phase three-level rectifiers," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 10097-10108, Oct. 2020.
[2] S. H. Kim, R. Y. Kim, and S. I. Kim, "Generalized model predictive control method for single-phase N-level flying capacitor multilevel rectifiers for solid state transformer," IEEE Trans. Industry Applications, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 7505-7514, Dec. 2019.
[3] X. Wu, C. Xiong, F. Diao, and Y. Zhang, "Modularized model predictive control scheme with capacitor voltage balance control for single-phase cascaded H-bridge rectifier," in Proc. IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE'18, pp. 4021-4023, Portland, OR, USA, 23-27 Sept. 2018.
[4] Y. Ounejjar, K. Al-Haddad, and L. A. Grégoire, "A novel high energetic efficiency multilevel topology with reduced impact on supply network," in Proc. 34th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IECON'15, pp. 489-494, Orlando, FL, USA, 10-13 Nov. 2015.
[5] H. Vahedi, H. Y. Kanaan, and K. Al-Haddad, "PUC converter review: topology, control and applications," in Proc. 41st Annual Conf. of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IECON'15pp. 4334-4339, Yokohama, Japan, 9-12 Nov. 2015.
[6] K. Rafael, S. Ventura, M. Abarzadeh, and K. Al-Haddad, "23-level single DC source hybrid PUC (H-PUC) converter topology with reduced number of components: real-time implementation with model predictive control," IEEE Open J. of the Industrial Electronics Society, vol. 1, pp. 127-137, 2020.
[7] M. Sharifzadeh and K. Al-Haddad, "Packed E-cell (PEC) converter topology operation and experimental validation," IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 127-137, 2020.
[8] Y. Ounejjar and K. Al-Haddad, "Current control of the three phase five-level PUC-NPC converter," in Proc. 38th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IECON'12, pp. 4949-4954, Montreal, QC, Canada, 25-28 Oct. 2012.
[9] Y. Ounejjar and K. Al-Haddad, "Multiband hysteresis controller of the novel three phase seven-level PUC-NPC converter," in Proc. 39th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IECON'13, pp. 6257-6262, Vienna, Austria, 10-13 Nov. 2013.
[10] Y. Ounejjar and K. Al-Haddad, "A novel 31-level packed U cells converter," in Proc. Int. Conf., Power Engeneering, Energy and Electrical Drivers, POWERENG'11, 6 pp., Malaga, Spain, 11-13 May 2011.
[11] M. Babaie, M. Mehrasa, M. Sharifzadeh, and K. Al-Haddad, "Low frequency finite set model predictive control for seven-level modified packed U-cell rectifier," in Proc. IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE'19, pp. 2719-2724, Baltimore, MD, USA, 29 Sept.-3 Oct. 2019.
[12] M. Sleiman, H. F. Blanchette, L. A. Gregoire, H. Kanaan, and K. Al-Haddad, "Model predictive control of a dual output seven-level rectifier," in Proc. 41st Annual Conf. of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IECON'15, vol. 5, pp. 005292-005297, Yokohama, Japan. 9-12 Nov. 2015.
[13] H. Makhamreh, M. Trabelsi, O. Kukrer, and H. Abu-Rub, "A lyapunov-based model predictive control design with reduced sensors for a PUC7 rectifier," IEEE Trans. Industrial Electron., vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 1139-1147, Feb. 2021.
[14] M. Babaie, M. Mehrasa, M. Sharifzadeh, and K. Al-Haddad, "Floating weighting factors ANN-MPC based on lyapunov stability for seven-level modified PUC active rectifier," IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 387-398, Jan. 2022.
[15] H. Vahedi and K. Al-Haddad, "A novel multilevel multi-output bidirectional active buck PFC rectifier," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 5442 - 5450, Sept. 2016.
[16] F. B. Grigoletto, D. Schuetz, L. A. Junior, F. M. canielutti, and H. pinheiro, "Space vector modulation for packed-U-cell converters (PUC)," in Proc. 44th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IECON'18, pp. 4498-4503, Washington, DC, USA, 21-23 Oct. 2018.
[17] M. Abarzadeh, S. Peyghami, and K. Al-Haddad, "Reliability and performance improvement of PUC converter using a new single-carrier sensor-less PWM method with pseudo reference functions," IEEE Trans. on Power Electronics, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 6092-6105, May 2021.
[18] A. Iqbal and M. Meraj, "Experimental investigation and comparative evaluation of standard level shifted multi-carrier modulation schemes with a constraint GA based SHE techniques for a seven-level PUC inverter," IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 100605-100617, 2019.
[19] R. Vasu, S. K. Chattopadhyay, and C. Chakraborty, "Seven-level packed U-cell (PUC) converter with natural balancing of capacitor voltages," IEEE Trans. on Industry Applications, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 5234-5244, Sept./Oct. 2020.
[20] Y. Ounejjar, K. Al-Haddad, and L. A. Grégoire, "Packed U cells multilevel converter topology: theoretical study and experimental validation," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1294-1306, Apr. 2011.
[21] M. Y. Vialba Onizuka, R. C. Garcia, and J. O. Pereira Pinto, "Control of a 7-levels PUC Based three phase inverter through vector current control and hybrid modulation," in Proc. 42nd Annual Conf. of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IECON'16, pp. 6488-6493, Florence, Italy, 23-26 Oct. 2016.
[22] M. Trabelsi, S. Bayhan, K. A. Ghazi, H. Abu-Rub, and L. Ben-Brahim, "Finite-control-set model predictive control for grid-connected packed-U-cells multilevel inverter," IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 7286-7295, Nov. 2016.